Filter precedents
1
Reset allBench: Nandan Singh, Soben Singh1278 of 2010
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Compounding Application No. 1278/2010 In Criminal Revision No. 951/2001 Nandan Singh & Others. …….Revisionists Versus State of Uttaranchal …….Respondent December 31, 2010 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Shri Umesh Kalakoti,
2048/2006
2007 Hon’ble Prafulla C.Pant, J. None present for the petitioners. Sri S.S. Adhikari, AGA for the State. On the last date also, no one on behalf of the petitioners, was present. Thereafter fresh notices were sent to the petitioners. Still there is none present on their behalf. …
902 of 2010
Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. R.K. Verma, Advocate, present for the petitioners. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought quashing of the first …
170 of 2002
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Delay Condonation Application No. 11003/2010 in Restoration Application No. 1092/2010 Writ Petition No. 170 of 2002 (M/S) Gurnam Singh S/o Sri Jagtar Singh … Petitioner Versus Commissioner Kumaun Mandal Nainital and others …. Respondents. Mr. M.C.
937 of 2009
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 937 of 2009 Smt. Beena Bhatt …….Petitioner. Versus The State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents. Sri Atul Bahuguna, Advocate present for the petitioner. Sri Dinesh Gahtori, Standing Counsel present for the State.
CR.A/419/2001
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No. 419/2001 Date of decision: 30.12. 2010 State of H.P. …..Appellant Versus Randhir Singh ……Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, J. Whether approved for …
CR.A/197/1996
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No.197 of 1996 Decided on : December 30, 2009 State of H.P. …Appellant. Versus Mange Ram …Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. Whether approved for …
Bench: Deepak GuptaCR.A/50/2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.Appeal No.50 of 2003 Decided on: 30th December, 2009 State of H.P …..Appellant. VERSUS Chandan Thakur & ors. …..Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No For the Appellant …
Bench: Deepak GuptaCWPOA/13581/2008
CWP(T) No.13581 of 2008 30.12.2010 Present: Mr. H.K.Paul counsel for the petitioner. Mr.Ramesh Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents- State. Keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is directed to be treated as representation to the …
Bench: Sanjay KarolCWPOA/13069/2008
CWP (T) No. 13069 of 2008 30.12.2010 Present: Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. In the reply filed by the respondents, it stands explained that as and when regular post shall be available, name of the petitioner …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault