Filter precedents
1
Reset all1012 of 2011
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 29th day of December, 2011 First Bail Application No. 1012 of 2011 Criminal Side Shanu Khan S/o Rahmat Khan @ Munna Khan R/o Mohalla Gulabganj P.S. Cant, District Guna Madhya Pradesh …….Applicant (In …
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-39485 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision 29.12.2011 Seema and another ... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: Mr.Sandeep Thakan, Advocate, for the …
2580 of 2011
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2580 of 2011 Pankaj Singh Deoliya ….Petitioner Versus Central Board of Secondary Education and another ..Respondents Present : Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gopal Narain, Advocate for the respondents.
695 of 2007
of 2007 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. V.D. Bisen, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. M.C. Pande, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. The petitioner is the plaintiff and had filed a suit for a declaration that the order of the District …
Bench: Garhwal Mandal
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1990 (MS) of 2008 Mussoorie Dehradun Development Authority …Petitioner Versus Sh. Anil Kumar Sharma …Respondent Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate present for the petitioner. Mr. B.P. Nautiyal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. …
1135 of 2011
of 2011 with CLMA No. 13871 of 2011 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate, present for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A., present for the State. Heard. By means of this writ petition moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioners …
Bench: Barin Ghosh, Udham Singh Nagar94 of 2002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Appeal no. 94 of 2002 Smt. Rahasan ………..Appellant versus State of Uttaranchal ……Opposite Party ……………………….. Mr K.S.Rawal, holding Brief of Mr.
1757 of 2011
of 2011 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Mr Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr Anil Bisht, Brief Holder for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the parties made statement at the bar that the controversy involved in the present writ …
145 of 2007
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 145 of 2007 (M/S) Autar Singh Rana … Petitioner Versus Arvind Mohan Saklani & others … Respondents Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. N.S. Pundir, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N.S. Negi, the learned
Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Sri Arvind Vashisth, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sudhir Kumar, the learned Brief Holder for the State/respondent no. 1 and Sri Ramji Srivastava, the learned counsel for respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4. In a suit for specific performance …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault