Filter precedents
1
Reset all10984 of 2020
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.10984 of 2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 31.12.2020 Priya and Another ..…... Petitioner(s) V/s. State of Punjab and Others ….....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. Ankit Kharbanda,
268 of 2020
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.268 of 2020 (S/B) Kishor Kumar & others …..Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand & others ...Respondents Shri B.D. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. 31st December, 2020 Coram : Hon’ble Ravi Malimath, A.C.J.
557 of 2020
of 2020 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. (via Video Conferencing) Mr. Udyog Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.K. Kapruwan, Advocate for the respondent. The petitioner of this contempt petition has alleged non compliance of the judgment dated 08.10.2020, which was …
Bench: Ravi Malimath, J. Alok Kumar Verma434 of 2020
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No.434 of 2020 Sunil Panwar …….Petitioner Vs. The Public Services Tribunal Uttarakhand, Dehradun and others ………Respondents Present : Shri Nalin Saun, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Pradeep Joshi,
2579 of 2020
of 2020 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.S. Phartiyal, Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand. Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing. According to the petitioner, he is Chairman of Committee of …
10995 of 2020
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.10995 of 2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 31.12.2020 Renu @ Ayat Shaikh and Another ..…... Petitioner(s) V/s. State of Union Territory Chandigarh and Others ….....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
2584 of 2020
of 2020 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J. Mr. Hemant Pant, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, Advocate for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing. Petitioner was granted a contract for running ropeway by Nagar Palika Parishad …
11635 of 2020
of 2020 (Withdrawal Application) In A.O. No. 393 of 2019 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J. The case is taken up through video conferencing. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate for the appellant. There is no representation for the respondent. In view of the facts mentioned in the affidavit …
59 of 2015
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 185 of 2016 Akhlaq Hussain ....... Revisionist Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others ...... Respondents Present: Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, Advocate for the revisionist. Mr. S.S.Adhikari, Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. …
Bench: Ravi Malimath, J. Ravi Malimath, A.C.J.Shri B.D. Kandpal160 of 2020
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 160 of 2020 Reena Garbayal ...Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others ...Respondents Shri Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri J.C. Pande, learned standing counsel for the State of …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault