CO/128/2026 of GOPAL ROY Vs MITHU DAS ROY
Bench: Supratim BhattacharyaCO/128/2026
Item No.8 Ct. No.8 MKP IN THE HIGH COURT AT
Bench: Supratim BhattacharyaCO/128/2026
Item No.8 Ct. No.8 MKP IN THE HIGH COURT AT
Bench: Ravi Krishan Kapur, Supratim BhattacharyaMAT/81/2026
Court No.11 J.Das CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT
Bench: Supratim BhattacharyaCO/294/2026
Ct. No. 21 Sl No. 1. ASR CO/294/2026 UTTAM BANERJEE VS MALAY KUMAR BANERJEE @ BANDHAPARDHYAY AND ANR. Mr. Younus Sultan …For the Appellant The learned Advocate on record representing the petitioner submits that the impugned order dated 20th January, 2026 is against the said …
Bench: Supratim BhattacharyaCO/299/2026
Ct. No. 21 Sl No. 6. ASR CO/299/2026 PAPRI CHAKRABORTY (SENGUPTA) VS PRADIPTA CHAKRABORTY This is the second day on which none is representing the petitioner and there is nobody to seek an accommodation for either of the parties. In such circumstance, the revisional application …
Bench: Supratim BhattacharyaCO/429/2026
Ct. no. 21 SL. 14 Samarpita In the High Court at Calcutta Civil Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side CO/429/2026 PINAKI DEB @ PINAKI RANJAN DEB VS ANUPAMA DEB Mr. Soumya Basu Roy Chowdhury .. for the petitioner 1. The learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that …
Bench: Supratim BhattacharyaCO/293/2026
Ct. No. 21 Sl No. 4. ASR CO/293/2026 GOUTAM GHOSH VS ARPITA GHOSH Mr. Debajyoti Deb Mr. Abhisekhy Roy Chowdhury Mr. S. Pathak Ms. Indrani Roy …For the petitioner Mr. Mrinal Kanti Ghosh …For the respondent Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner be kept with the record. The
Bench: Supratim BhattacharyaCO/1154/2019
9 Court No.21 BM C.O. 1154 of 2019 PARESH CH.GIRI VS BANABALA SASMAL & ANR. 1. On the earlier occasion i.e. 10th August, 2026 none had represented the parties. Today, also none is representing either the petitioner or the opposite parties. 2. In such circumstance, the matter is …
Bench: Supratim BhattacharyaCO/4139/2019
13 Court No.21 BM C.O. 4139 of 2019 MUNMUN KARMAKAR VS ABHISHEK KARMAKAR 1. On the earlier occasion i.e. 10th August, 2026 none had represented the parties. Today, also none is representing either the petitioner or the opposite party. 2. In such circumstance, the matter is …
Bench: Supratim BhattacharyaCO/1097/2019
8 Court No.21 BM C.O. 1097 of 2019 SWAPAN DUTTA & ORS VS SMT BASANTI GHORUI & ORS 1. On the earlier occasion i.e. 10th August, 2026 none had represented the parties. Today, also none is representing either the petitioners or the opposite parties. 2. In such circumstance, the …
Bench: Supratim BhattacharyaCO/639/2019
7 Court No.21 BM C.O. 639 of 2019 SUPRABHAT GHOSH VS MAYURJAN BIBI & ANR 1. On the earlier occasion i.e. 10th August, 2026 none had represented the parties. Today also none is representing either the petitioner or the opposite party. 2. In such circumstance, the matter is …