Filter results by 2
Courts
Judges in the latest 300
- Ravi Malimath38
- J. Ravi Malimath32
- Sudhanshu Dhulia5
- J. Alok Kumar Verma3
- J. Ravi Malimath3
- A.C.J.Shri B.D. Kandpal1
- Acj.Shri N.S. Pundir1
- Nand Vihar1
Years
Decided between
Uttarakhand High Court — latest judgments
1–10 of 9,425 judgments, newest first (0.23 seconds)
-
WPCRL/2229/2020 of KAILASH SINGH ALIAS LOKESH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2020
of 2020 Hon’ble N.S. Dhanik, J. (Via Video Conferencing) Mr. Abhishek Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Manisha Rana Singh, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Balvinder Singh and Mrs. Meena Bisht, learned Brief Holders for the State. This writ petition is filed seeking …
-
CLCON/85/2017 of Ved Prakash Gupta Vs Sweety Aggarwal
Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2020
85 of 2017 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. (Via Video Conferencing) Mr. Akram Parvez, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the applicant. Learned appearing counsel Mr. Akram Parvez makes a statement that the judgment dated 03.05.2016, which contained a …
-
SA/3/2013 of HARCHARAN SINGH KOHLI Vs SHRI KESHAV DUTT GURUANI
Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2020
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Second Appeal No. 3 of 2013 Harcharan Singh Kohli and Others ...Appellants Vs. Shri Keshav Dutt Guruani and Others ...Respondents Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. D.K. Joshi, Advocate for respondent no. 1. With …
-
CLCON/86/2017 of Hem Chandra Lohni Vs MR. RANVEER SINGH CHAUHAN
Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2020
86 of 2017 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. (Via Video Conferencing) Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. R.C. Arya, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. This contempt petition was preferred by the applicant seeking enforcement of the judgment dated …
-
WPSB/268/2020 of KISHOR KUMAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2020
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.268 of 2020 (S/B) Kishor Kumar & others …..Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand & others ...Respondents Shri B.D. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. 31st December, 2020 Coram : Hon’ble Ravi Malimath, A.C.J.
-
CLCON/557/2020 of DURGA DEVI Vs K K UPADHAYAY
Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2020
of 2020 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. (via Video Conferencing) Mr. Udyog Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.K. Kapruwan, Advocate for the respondent. The petitioner of this contempt petition has alleged non compliance of the judgment dated 08.10.2020, which was …
-
WPSB/434/2020 of SUNIL PANWAR Vs PUBLIC SERVICE TRIBUNAL UTTARAKHAND
Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2020
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No.434 of 2020 Sunil Panwar …….Petitioner Vs. The Public Services Tribunal Uttarakhand, Dehradun and others ………Respondents Present : Shri Nalin Saun, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Pradeep Joshi,
Ravi Malimath, J. Alok Kumar Verma
-
WPMS/2579/2020 of SANTA SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2020
of 2020 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.S. Phartiyal, Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand. Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing. According to the petitioner, he is Chairman of Committee of …
-
WPMS/2584/2020 of RAJENDRA PRASAD BANGWAL Vs NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD MUSSOORIE
Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2020
of 2020 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J. Mr. Hemant Pant, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, Advocate for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing. Petitioner was granted a contract for running ropeway by Nagar Palika Parishad …
-
AO/393/2019 of GOPAL SINGH PARIHAR Vs RATAN SINGH PARIHAR
Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2020
of 2020 (Withdrawal Application) In A.O. No. 393 of 2019 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J. The case is taken up through video conferencing. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate for the appellant. There is no representation for the respondent. In view of the facts mentioned in the affidavit …