Filter precedents
1
Reset allBench: Ravi R.Tripathi11386 of 2001
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 11386 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the …
Bench: Kundan Singh6663 of 1985
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6663 of 1985 With SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6098 of 1989 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local …
Bench: A.L.Dave4219 of 2001
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4219 of 2001 with SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5191 OF 2001 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers …
SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR COMPANY APPLICATION NO.1216 OF 2011 IN C.P.NO.75 OF 2001 DATED 6TH DECEMBER, 2012 The Official Liquidator, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. … Applicant THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR COMPANY APPLICATION NO.1216 OF 2011 IN C.P.NO.75 OF
---...-.-...... ,...__ „, ..IN THE Wm'BlS HIGH eOJSS QP JtJECeATURE AT BILASroRfq.g.) Writ Petitt©nHo. 2.0z2/iQQi Smt. Sh. l.axaai Kantam w/o Oa. H. Itarthy Oecupation House wife a /0. Rly eelony, Banglawyard Bilaspur (e.G.) Versus SBSP0NBENT , 1. The State of
OF JUDICATURB AT BILA3Pm_iCHHATTISGAKH)_ WRIT PETITION No. 2-^~22/ QF 2001 PBriTIQI RBSPOIDEMS : ..•^> ^y >-^ ^'.. •<?<•- ^y "^- 'T^" c>-^ ^" <^ v\''' ^ A ^ \^/1 /../:M^r^'st^i {^^^^ \' ^. ..^\„. ^••^ '^ ^ .€\ ^" \K .^ .,^-
GOURT OF CHHATTI$GABH MQT BQASEUR writ ivetition No._,_239?/2oo1 PETITION LR RESPONDENTS : Tularam Jaiswal, S/o Shri Jnodiram Jaiswal, aged a‘baut 1+0 years, R/o Kodma Iviahant $.Q. Dongaria, Lormi, Dis trict- Bilas pur . - Versus — u “4., tate of Chhattis garb ihro ugh:
1285 of 2001
of 2001 (Old No. 5255 of 1998) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondents. As stated by the learned counsel for the parties before this court that a settlement has been arrived between the parties that respondents nos.2 to 51 …
No. 7055 (SS) of 2001 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard Sri S.S. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner. No good ground is made out to entertain the writ petition. Therefore, I am not inclined to entertain the same. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed in limine. (P.C. …
No. 7071 (SS) of 2001 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard Sri Manoj Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Chief Standing counsel. Learned counsel for the parties are unanimous that the subject matter involved in this writ petition is covered by the judgment passed in …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault