Filter precedents
1
Reset all1003 of 2003
No. 1003 of 2003 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Heard Mr. L.K. Tiwari, Advocate for the applicant and learned Government Advocate for the State. The applicant is facing prosecution for the offence punishable under Section 304B I.P.C./3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. Considering the facts and …
973 of 2003
of 2003 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard learned Advocate for the parties and learned Chief Standing Counsel Mr. N.B. Tewari. This writ petition has been field by the petitioners seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Chief Conservator of Forest and the …
1117 of 2003
of 2003 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard leaned counsel on both sides. Perused the First Information Report dated 20.11.2002. It discloses cognizable offence and the allegations made therein are inherently probable. Therefore we are not inclined to entertain …
1159 of 2003
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 29th day of December, 2003 Crl. Bail Application No. 1159 of 2003 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Chandra Shekhar Pandey, S/o Shri Bhuwan Chandra Pandey, R/o Village Bhatarh, Patti …
988 of 2003
of 2003 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Shri Rajendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioner and Shri D.S. Patni, Advocate for the respondent. Since the charge-sheet has been submitted, petition has become infructuous. Therefore, writ petition is …
2003 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J, Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. S.S. Yadav made a statement at bar that he does not want to press the petition. Therefore, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (P.C. Verma, A.C.J.) ( Rajesh Tandon, J,) Dt. 29.12.2003.
8 of 1987
(Old No. 1013/1987) Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. None appeared for both the parties. I have perused the judgment dated 20.05.1987 passed by Sessions Judge, Almora in criminal appeal No. 8 of 1987 under Section 279/337/304A I.P.C. In my opinion, the judgment does not suffer from any …
342 of 2002
No. 342 of 2002 (Old No. 5725 of 2000) Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. None is appeared for the applicants though called twice. The application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Dt. 29.12.2003. (P.C. Verma, A.C.J.)
1089 of 2003
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 29th day of December, 2003 Crl. Bail Application No. 1089 of 2003 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Rajesh Kumar, S/o Shri Keshav Dev, R/o Subhash Nagar, P.S. Sayani Gate, Ghaziabad, District …
Bench: P.C. Verma
THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. Appeal from Order No. 1535 of 2001 U.P. State Road Transport Corporation … Appellant. Versus S. Malkiat Singh and others … Respondents. Mr. A.N.Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. B.P. Nautiyal, learned counsel for the
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault