Filter precedents
1
Reset all(SS) 2004 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard Sri S.S. Chaudhary and Sri K. Ali learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, Smt. Beena Pandey for respondents no. 2 and Sri D.S. Patni, learned counsel for the respondents no. 4 & 7. Learned counsel fro the petitioner …
Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J ( CLMA 7503 of 2004) Heard Sh. S.S. Chaudhary learned counsel for the petitioner and Sh. D.S. Patni learned counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that that question raised in the present writ
(SS) 2004 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard Sri Rakesh Thapliyal, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel, who has accepted notices on behalf of respondents. Both the parties are agreed to decide the writ petition at its admission stage itself. By means of …
Bench: Irshad Hussain1255
Court of Uttaranchal, at Nainital Civil W.P. No. 1255 (M/B) of 2004 Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL) through AGM Sh. M.S. Rautela Srinagar (SSA) ………….. Petitioner. Versus (1) The Commissioner Appeals Customs and Central Excise, Meerut-I, Mangal Pandey Nagar Meerut. (2)
784
Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard Sri Chetan Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel who has accepted notices on behalf of all the respondents. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a writ in the nature of certiorari …
1590
(SS) 2004 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard Sri S.S. Chaudhary learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, Smt. Beena Pandey for respondents no. 2 and Sri D.S. Patni, learned counsel for the respondents no. 4 to 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted …
Court of Uttaranchal, at Nainital. W.P. No. 1262 (M/B) of 2004 (1) Smt. Meena W/o Late Sh. Gangesh Kumar @ Bhullan, R/o Mokshadham Ashram Doodhadhari Chauk Dist. Haridwar (2) Chhote Lal R/o Mokshadham Ashram Doodhadhari Chauk Dist. Haridwar (3) Chandrakali, W/o Chhote Lal …
Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard Sri Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for Union of India. Both the parties are agreed that the writ petition may be decided finally at this stage. By means of order dated 9th December 2004, the …
22
(SB) of 2004 Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J (CLMA 7503 of 2004) Heard Sh. S.S. Chauchan leaned counsel for the petitioner and Sh. D.S. Patni learned counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that that question raised in the …
of 2001 Old No. 42342 of 1998 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. File has been transferred from Allahabad High Court. None appears for the parties. It appears that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault