Filter precedents
1
Reset all232 of 2020
Ct.8 KAUSHIK/CHC Allowed C.R.M. No.11299 of 2020 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Chapra Police Station Case No.232 of 2020 dated 03.07.2020 under Sections 341/325/326/307/34 of the Indian Penal …
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRWP-11020-2020 Date of Decision: 31.12.2020 Shimla ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present : Mr. Jatinder Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. …
22787 of 2020
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 22787 of 2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 31.12.2020 (Heard through VC) Associate Group Security and Service Private Limited ...Petitioner Versus National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Punjab RO (NABARD) …
571 of 2020
12 31.12.2020 rrc/ss CRM 10914 of 2020 (via Video Conference) In re : An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Hanskahali PS Case No. 571 of 2020 dated 27.10.2020 under Sections 341/326/307/34 of the Indian Penal …
835 of 2019
KAUSHIK/CHC Rejected C.R.M. No.11298 of 2020 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Krishnagar Kotwali Police Station Case No.835 of 2019 dated 02.12.2019 under Section 272 of the Indian Penal Code and …
620 of2020
mb/pg. Rejected CRM 11300 of 2020 (Through Video Conference) In Re: - An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Hanskhali P.S. Case No.620 of 2020 dated 13.11.2020 under Sections 363/365/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In …
2229 of 2020
of 2020 Hon’ble N.S. Dhanik, J. (Via Video Conferencing) Mr. Abhishek Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Manisha Rana Singh, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Balvinder Singh and Mrs. Meena Bisht, learned Brief Holders for the State. This writ petition is filed seeking …
85 of 2017
85 of 2017 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. (Via Video Conferencing) Mr. Akram Parvez, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the applicant. Learned appearing counsel Mr. Akram Parvez makes a statement that the judgment dated 03.05.2016, which contained a …
1 of 2011
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Second Appeal No. 3 of 2013 Harcharan Singh Kohli and Others ...Appellants Vs. Shri Keshav Dutt Guruani and Others ...Respondents Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. D.K. Joshi, Advocate for respondent no. 1. With …
116 of 2014
86 of 2017 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. (Via Video Conferencing) Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. R.C. Arya, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. This contempt petition was preferred by the applicant seeking enforcement of the judgment dated …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault