Uttarakhand High Court — latest judgments

1. WPSS/227/2000 of DR RAKESH TYAGI and OTHERS Vs STATE OF UTTARANCHAL

   Uttarakhand High Court 20 December 2000

   of 2000 (S/S) Hon. P.C. Verma, J. Learned State Counsel has brought to the notice of the court that ordinance has been issued desolving the municipality and administrators have been appointed. In view of this, the writ petition has become infructuous. It is accordingly …

2. WPMS/210/2000 of G.M HILL REGION U.P.C.L Vs BALWANT SINGH and ANOTHER

   Uttarakhand High Court 15 December 2000

   of 2000 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Any finding of the labour court has not been shown to be preferred therefore no interference is called for under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. (P.C. …

3. WPSS/211/2000 of PRAMOD KUMAR and ANR. Vs STATE and ORS.

   Uttarakhand High Court 15 December 2000

   of 2000(S/S) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned Chief Standing Counsel and the learned counsel for the petitioner and in their agreement the petition is being disposed of . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that work and post are available. If the work and post are …

4. WPSS/193/2000 of MAHIPAL SINGH DOBAL Vs KUMAUN MANDAL VIKASH NIGAM LTD.

   Uttarakhand High Court 15 December 2000

   of 2000 (S/S) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. He submitted that the petitioner is working since last 10 years but is not being paid the minimum pay scale. If the work and post is available, then the petitioner shall also be given minimum pay …

5. WPSS/201/2000 of MATHURA PRASAD and OTHERS Vs STATE OF UTTARANCHAL

   Uttarakhand High Court 15 December 2000

   No. 201 (SS) of 2000 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Notices have been accepted by learned Chief Standing Counsel. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. With the consent of the parties counsel this writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction to the opposite parties to pay …

6. WPSS/218/2000 of SMT KAMLA DEVI Vs STATE OF UTTARANCHAL

   Uttarakhand High Court 15 December 2000

   of 2000(S/S) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Chief Standing Counsel. The husband of the petitioner died in harness and the petitioner sought appointment under dying in harness Rules. Considering the facts and circumstances of the …

7. WPSS/208/2000 of G.M. U.P. POWER CORPORATION Vs DEO SINGH and OTHERS

   Uttarakhand High Court 15 December 2000

   of 2000(S/S) Hon. P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Any finding of the labour court has not been shown to be perversed therefore no interference is called for under Article 226 of constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. Sd/-

8. WPSS/214/2000 of G M HILL REGION U.P.P.C. LTD Vs DHAN SINGH

   Uttarakhand High Court 15 December 2000

   of 2000(S/S) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Any finding of the Labour Court has not been shown to be perused, therefore, no interference is called for under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. …

9. WPSB/206/2000 of NAVEEN BHARTIYA Vs STATE OF UTTARANCHAL

   Uttarakhand High Court 15 December 2000

   Misc. Writ Petition no.206 of 2000 Naveen Bhartiya ........... Petitioner Versus State of Uttranchal through Secretary, Social welfare, Dehradun and others ........... Respondents Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. Hon’ble M.C.Jain,J. The petitioner was transferred from District Udhamsingh

10. WPSS/207/2000 of SMT MANJU RAUTELA and OTHERS Vs STATE and OTHERS

    Uttarakhand High Court 15 December 2000

    of 2000 (SS) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned standing counsel. Transfer is an exigency of service and no interference is called for by this Court, but keeping in view the fate of the students it is directed that the petitioner …