Uttarakhand High Court — latest judgments

1. BA1/1476/2007 of YASHWANT SINGH Vs STATE

   Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2007

   Hon’ble Dharam Veer J. Sri Vinod Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he does not want to press the bail application and submitted that the bail application may be dismissed as not pressed. In view of the above statement, the bail application is dismissed as …

2. WPSS/1859/2007 of PRATAP SINGH and ORS Vs STATE and ORS

   Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2007

   2007 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri S.S. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised in the present …

3. SA/719/2000 of SHER MOHAMMAD AND ORS. Vs HABIB AHMAD AND ORS.

   Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2007

   UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL (Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting) Description of the Case S.A. No. 1193 of 2001 Sher Mohammad and others Vs. Habib Ahmad Approved for reporting Date of Decision – 31.12.2007 Initial of Judge:

4. GA/456/2007 of STATE Vs JAKIR

   Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2007

   COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ABATMENT APPLICATION NO. 745/2007 IN GOVERNMENT APPEAL NO.456 of 2007 State of Uttaranchal .......... Appellant Versus Jakir S/o Sri Latif R/o Village Karanja P.S. Laksar, District Haridwar. ............... Respondent Dated: December 31, 2007 Sri …

5. WPSB/1139/2002 of KIRPAL SINGH PAWAR Vs STATE and ORS

   Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2007

   of 2002 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri R.K. Shah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised in the present …

6. WPSS/1479/2006 of BALBIR SINGH BISHT and ORS Vs STATE and ORS

   Uttarakhand High Court 29 December 2007

   COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL [Court’s order whether the case is approved for reporting or not under Chapter VIII Rule 32 (2) (b)] Description of the case Writ Petition No. 1479 (SS) of 2006 Balbir Singh Bisht and others. ….Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others.

7. CRLA/901/1989 of AWATAR SINGH Vs STATE

   Uttarakhand High Court 29 December 2007

   THE CASE IS OR IS NOT APPROVED FOR REPORTING {Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2)(b)} Description of the Case. CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 598 of 2001 (Old No. 901 of 1989) Awatar Singh …………Appellant Versus The State ……….Respondent Sri Rajeev Mohan, ld. Amicus

8. WPSB/1435/2002 of MITTHAN LAL SHAH Vs SECRETARY, NAGAR VIKASH and ORS.

   Uttarakhand High Court 29 December 2007

   2002 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri A.D. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. Keeping in view …

9. WPMS/2387/2007 of UTTARAKHAND JAL VIDYUT NIGAM LTD. Vs ASSISTT. COMMISIIONER OF INCOME TAX and ANR.

   Uttarakhand High Court 29 December 2007

   COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2387 (M/S) of 2007 Uttarakhand Jal Vidyut Nigam Limited, Ujjawal, Maharani Bagh, GMS Road, Dehradun, through its General Manager (Finance & Accounts) ....Petitioner Vs 1. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-2, Dehradun. …

10. WPSS/1844/2007 of RAJENDRA SINGH Vs STATE OF UK THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

    Uttarakhand High Court 29 December 2007

    2007 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard Sri Yogesh Pacholia, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised in the present …