Filter precedents
1
Reset all2001 Hon.Irshad Hussain,J. Hon. M.M. Ghildiyal,J. According to Sri Nanak Chandra Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner the petition has become infructuous. In view of this the petition is accordingly disposed of being infructuous. (M.M. Ghildiyal,J.) (Irshad Hussain,J.) Dt. …
2002 Hon. Irshad Hussain, J. Hon. M.M.Ghildiyal,J. Heard Sri B.D. Upadhaya learned counsel or the petitioner and learned Addl. C.S.C. The grievance of the petitioner is that she is working as Assistant Teacher in B.T.C. grade since 1985 and she has not been given promotion in …
2002 Hon'ble Irshad Hussain, J. Hon'ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri U.K. Uniyal, learned counsel for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is that he was in jail for more than 48 hours without any fault and …
2002 Hon. Irshad Hussain, J. Hon. M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri B.D. Upadhyaya learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. C.S.C. The grievance of the petitioner is that she is working as Assistant Teacher in B.T.C. grade since 1986 and she has not been given promotion …
2002 Hon. Irshad Hussain, J. Hon. M.M.Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri C.D.Bahuhuna, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Nanak Chand Gupta, learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner had appeared in the High School Examination and as per the result declared he was shown failed in …
360 of 2002
misc. petition no. 360 of 2002 Dr. Rajpal Saini & others ….Applicants. Vs. State of Uttaranchal & others. …Opposite parties. Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. This is a petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter for short
1022 of 2016
SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM COMPANY APPLICATION No.1022 OF 2016 In C.P.No.131 of 2000 ORDER: The Official Liquidator, through the instant application, under Section 462 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rules 306 & 298 of the Company (Court) Rules, 1959, filed the half …
Bench: Elipe Dharma Rao23381 of 2000
MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.23381 of 2000 ORDER: The petitioner filed the present writ petition seeking a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 4 in trying to dispossess the petitioner forcibly as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner claims …
3142 of 2019
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT %DATED: 14.02.2019 *CORAM THE
411 of 1995
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 22/11/2002 Coram The
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault