Filter results by 1
Document types
Courts
- Bombay High Court56312
- Kerala High Court55404
- Patna High Court43187
- Telangana High Court28102
- Punjab and Haryana High Court18443
- Rajasthan High Court15859
- Gujarat High Court10284
- Chhattisgarh High Court9470
Judges in the latest 300
- Debtsrecovery Tribunal8
- Goda Raghuram6
- Ghulam Mohammed6
- R.P. Sondurbaldota4
- D.S.R.Varma3
- V.Eswaraiah3
- F.I. Rebello3
- R.P.Sondurbaldota2
Years
Decided between
All courts — latest judgments
151–160 of 258,046 judgments, newest first (0.23 seconds)
-
CWP/869/2007 of UPPER LOHARA CO-OP.SOCIETY Vs STATE
Himachal Pradesh High Court 31 December 2008
of 2007. 31.12.2008 Present: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 3. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Ajay Sharma submits …
-
RFA/13/2002 of BUDHI SINGH Vs STATE
Himachal Pradesh High Court 31 December 2008
HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA RFA No.: 13 of 2002 Reserved on: 18.12.2008 Decided on: 31.12.2008 Budhi Singh and another ………Appellants. Versus State of H.P. and others ………Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr.Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. Whether approved
-
CR.R/177/2002 of JAI RAM Vs BHUWAN CHAND
Himachal Pradesh High Court 31 December 2008
of 2002. 31.12.2008. Present: Mr.T.S. Chauhan, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.N.K. Thakur, counsel for respondent No.1. Ms.Shubh Mahajan, Dy.A.G., for respondent No.2. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that the vehicle in question has been taken by the Financer. In …
-
CRIMINAL APPEAL 300 of 2002
Himachal Pradesh High Court 31 December 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Criminal Appeal No.300 of 2002 Date of decision: 31.12.2008 State of H.P Vs …Petitioner Karam Sinh ….Resondent gp Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?[1] No For the Petitioner:/State. …
-
WRIT PETITION 2938/2008
Himachal Pradesh High Court 31 December 2008
CWP No. 2938/2008 31.12.2008 Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1. CMP No.4144 of 2008. Allowed. CWP No. 2938/2008 & CMP No. 4143/2008. The petitioner made a …
-
CRMPM/1355/2008 of CHAMAN LAL Vs STATE
Himachal Pradesh High Court 31 December 2008
of 2008. 31.12.2008 Present: Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General for the respondent. The learned Senior Additional Advocate General has produced the entire …
-
WPSS/1089/2008 of SMT KELA DEVI Vs STATE AND OTHERS
Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2008
UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1089 of 2008 (S/S) Smt. Kela Devi ….Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ....Respondents. Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 31st …
-
BA1/1125/2008 of ARUN KUMAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2008
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital the 31st December, 2008 Order on the bail application of accused First Bail Application No.1125 of 2008 CRIMINAL SIDE Arun Kumar, S/o Sajan Singh. ….Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …Opposite Party …
-
WPMS/1052/2003 of KAMAL KUMAR JAIN Vs PRESCRIBED AUTORITY and ORS.
Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2008
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1052 of 2003 (M/S) Kamal Kumar Jain ..…… Petitioner Versus Prescribed Authority/ First Addl. Civil Judge, Dehradun and others …….. Respondents ………. Mr. Anurag Bisaria, Advocate for the petitioner.
-
WPCRL/182/2008 of SMT. PRIYANKA and ANR Vs STATE and ORS
Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2008
Relief Application No. 1002 of 2008 In WPCRL No. 182 of 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. None appears for the petitioners though called out twice. Mr. Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. is present for the State of Uttarakhand. Writ petition is dismissed for want of