Chhattisgarh High Court — latest judgments

1. WP/1/2000 of MOHD.HASAN KHAN and ANR. Vs THE STATE OF C.G. and ORS.

   Chhattisgarh High Court 29 December 2000

   cexm'r OF cumi‘xsam AT BILASPUR (caj. v writ Pen non Na. ’ /2ooo Pett timers. :: 1e Mohd Easan’ Khan, sen mt An Ahmad, aged about 5O yours. r/e Baez-standa Read mlaspur (CHfa 2o M/ a Kanker Readways, Through the Managing Partner Preetam Singh Gamma, r/ a near Gandhi

   Ramesh Surajmal Garg

2. WP/97/2000 of MOHD.HASSANKHAN Vs STATE OF C.G.and0RS

   Chhattisgarh High Court 29 December 2000

   iviohd. Hassan Khan S/o Ali Ahamad Khan, Aged 42 years, Bus Operator, Bus Stand Road, Bilaspur( Chhattisg arh State) - Versus - RnSPOMDENTqu- l. The State of Ghhattisgarh, “E through: Secretary Transport Department‘,D o K. Bhawan, kit; W %%I£Wé“w%

   Ramesh Surajmal Garg

3. WP/42/2000 of GRAM PANCHAYAT Vs GOVT.OF C.G.

   Chhattisgarh High Court 15 December 2000

   COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) 5f3>wan“ pmmmm No.\)\’/,0F 2000 BETWEEN Gram Panchayat,‘ Sikosh,‘ through its Sarpanch,8mt. Puspa Bai Patel a’ged 35_years, W/o Shri Vishhu ?rasad Patel,‘ Sarpanch , Gram Panchayat Sikosh, Block ~ Development

   Ramesh Surajmal Garg

4. WP/79/2000 of ATMA RAM Vs THE STATE OF C.G

   Chhattisgarh High Court 14 December 2000

   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR GIHATTISGARH w.P.No. 2 ./2ooo (PETITION UNDm ARTICLE *226 AND 227 OF TPE CONSTITUTION) ‘V // l// PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR WRITS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI MANDAMUS mOHIBITION ETC. AND FOR …

   Ramesh Surajmal Garg

5. WP/25/2000 of VEER BHAN JINDAL Vs THE STATE OF C.G.

   Chhattisgarh High Court 14 December 2000

   QF JUDECATURE AT BILASPUR (CHEATTISHARM WRIT PETITION NO} \ OF 2000 BEE’IWEEN Veerbhan Jindal Son o£ late shri Mahan Chand Jindal, Vyavaai(Conmercial) knd residential Centre ,TransportNagar Korba Chlgattisgarh. aged about 50 years, resident ofrPlot No.12, Indra L PETI’I'IONER

   Ramesh Surajmal Garg

6. CRR/282/2000 of Baji Rao Banjari Vs Manik Lal

   Chhattisgarh High Court 13 December 2000

   CF0000088401 649‘!“ , REEEWEB {m TRmSEER’;N ma HIGH cmRT 9E- mxcmum AT JABALLHR ‘ cnom 3- m5“ RIMINAL REvIsmN N0. Q3)— {3F 2906 mqw Bemh kCrmma‘» uunkCM” mu coU F B ”SP“ gATHSGARHg REVISI'QN U/S 397/40; cm? OF

7. WP/66/2000 of MANBAHAL SINGH Vs STATE and ORS.

   Chhattisgarh High Court 13 December 2000

   COURT OF JUD‘ (CHEATTISGARH) ICAL‘URE AT :__B’I"Iasp‘t:ia mm pETxTION N0. {C OF 1%2CNQé9 . BETMEEN Manbahal Singh aged about 4O years, S/o Ram 8ingh .bycaste Rajput, tesident ‘ of village Chhindmuda,P.0 Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa (WP).

   Ramesh Surajmal Garg

8. WP/5199/2000 of DILIP SINGH BHUVAL Vs STATE OF M.P. and ORS.

   Chhattisgarh High Court 13 December 2000

   C01.1RT <»F .JUCtiTGATOHE WTUSeALPUfi TM.P.T W. P. No.^ ' ^ £? /2000 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Dilip Si'ngh Bhuval, S/b. late Shri Lakhan Singh Bhuval, aged 42 years, OCcupation Business, C/o. Bhuv.ai Bricks, ViTlage ^BaTodi, Dist. Durg (M.P.) V ER S US 1. State of Madhya

   Ramesh Surajmal Garg

9. CRR/306/2000 of Ravinder Kuamr Nanda Vs Smt. Jugga Devi

   Chhattisgarh High Court 13 December 2000

   £ i hihawusGMx-i aumc} mw, ‘vu‘uBKL I. ‘ ‘ 1Aswgt 3 V 3‘25, { ‘1- IN TEE mGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT JABALPgki mmmm REVIsmN N0. 366 _03 2000: )‘mgle xiencn W‘“mm?‘ ‘ CF0000088395 REVISIONLIS‘I’;

10. CRA/751/2000 of Lodharo Ram @ Tulsi Vs State of Madhya Pradesh

    Chhattisgarh High Court 12 December 2000

    F SAL- OT F R I c. "I 111'& ?• et.49 Ns'ne ^?^--?T5~$..^rg^T Father's nsme •^i3)3TS"''^c^r ( Resj'aence An^f^^-vy?' 'W;'^' •^'X l. CF0000062928 •! ^ C Seatenced to •^E<TC-tX '^Sff 1Cder section •307^ ^ffi-^ ^•5^'^^ S"zt/^ ^^ ;; ai-^Uiii^i