Showing 391–400 of 14,652 judgments, newest first 0.20 seconds

  • Decided 2003✕
Filter precedents 1 Reset all

CourtsTotal 8

Decision period

Presiding judgeslatest 300

All courts — latest judgments

  1. Delhi High Court 18 December 2003

    ARB.P./150/2003 of AKSH OPTIFIBRE Vs B.S.NIGAM

    7258/2003

    HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7258/2003 CSIR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Akshit Gupta, Adv. versus P.P.GARG ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R % 22.03.2024 CM APPL. 34863/2023 …

    1 Page
  2. Calcutta High Court 18 December 2003

    WRIT PETITION None

    24-02-2021 ct no. 13 Sl.3 pk WPCRC 17175 of 2003 (Through Video Conference) Manoranjan Chakrkaborty Versus Sri Subimal Samanta and others Mr. Ashim Kumar Routh …for the petitioner The writ petitioner seeks to move thiscontempt application filed in the year 2003. Itappears from …

    2 Pages
  3. Uttarakhand High Court 18 December 2003

    BA1/1168/2003 of TAHIR Vs STATE

    1168 of 2003

    COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 18th day of December 2003 Bail application no. 1168 of 2003 Order on the bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Tahir S/o Sri Asgar R/o Kamroo, P.S. Mooda Pandey District Moradabad ... Applicant …

    1 Page
  4. Uttarakhand High Court 18 December 2003

    BA1/1094/2003 of SHAHID Vs STATE

    1094 of 2003

    COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 18th day of December, 2003. Bail Application no. 1094 of 2003 Order on the Bail Application of the accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Shahid S/o Sri Abdul Majeed R/o Village Kanora, P.S. Bazpur District Udham Singh …

    1 Page
  5. Uttarakhand High Court 18 December 2003

    CRLA/342/1983 of BASIR Vs STATE

    978 of 2001

    COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Order whether the case is or not approved for reporting (Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b)) Description of case Criminal Appeal No. 978 of 2001, decided on 18.12.2003 Bashir Vs. State A.F.R. (Approved for reporting) Not approved for reporting Date …

    8 Pages
  6. Uttarakhand High Court 18 December 2003

    BA2/1031/2003 of AMRISH Vs STATE

    1031 of 2003

    COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 18th day of December 2003 Second Bail Application No. 1031 of 2003 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Amrish S/o Sri Omkar R/o village Kinoni P.S. Sahpur District Muzaffarnagr

    1 Page
  7. Uttarakhand High Court 18 December 2003

    BA1/1170/2003 of ANAND SINGH Vs STATE

    1170 of 2003

    COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION [ [ Dated: Nainital: the 18th day of December 2003 Bail application no. 1170 of 2003 Order on the bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Anand Singh S/o Sri Than Singh R/o Village Matkunda, Patti Khatli Malla District …

    1 Page
  8. Uttarakhand High Court 18 December 2003

    WPSS/1416/2003 of OM PRAKASH Vs UNION OF INDIA and ORS.

    1416 of 2003

    UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL (Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting.) (Chapter VIII Rule 32 (2) (b) Description of the case W.P. No.1416 of 2003 (SS) Sub. Om Prakash vs. Union of India & others Approved for reporting. __________________ Not approved for …

    5 Pages

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead