Filter precedents
1
Reset allHon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. R.S. Sammal, Adv. for the applicant. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant stated at bar that the present bail application has been rendered infructuous in view of the fact that the trial has now been concluded …
11/2009
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 31st day of December, 2009 Ist Bail Application No.1287 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Farman .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party
Bench: L.K. Tiwari2249 of 2009
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2249 OF 2009 (MS) Amarnath …………..Petitioner. Versus Collector/District Magistrate, Haridwar and others. ………..Respondents. Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl.
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. None is present for the petitioner. Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State, who makes a statement that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners No.1-Mohd. Umar, no.4-Hazi Moh. Yusuf, no.5-Aalam and …
1001 of 2009
of 2009 In CLCON No.295 of 2009 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Misc. application No.1001 of 2009 is allowed. The photographs annexed to the contempt application and marked as Annexure-10- A from pages 92 to 97 may be returned to Shri M. Mamaluddin, the learned counsel for the …
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. None is present for the petitioner. Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State, who makes a statement at bar that as per the information received by him, after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the petitioner-Rayan …
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. (Delay Condn. Appln. No.11389/09) None is present for the petitioners. Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State. Perused the application supported by affidavit. Delay in filing the counter affidavit is condoned. Delay condonation application is …
1190 of 2009
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal Ist Bail Application No.1190 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Mannu S/o Lachhi Ram ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party
1285 of 2009
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 31st day of December, 2009 Ist Bail Application No.1285 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Dhani Ram .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party
1279 of 2009
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 31st day of December, 2009 Ist Bail Application No.1279 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Mukesh & Another .….Applicants (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ……
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault